Back to Blog
GTM Strategy

First 90 Days GTM for Pre-PMF SaaS

SaaS Consult Editor
Sep 17, 2025
7 min read

Launching a SaaS without product-market fit (PMF) is like setting sail with half a map. You may know the destination, but the route is uncharted. The first 90 days pre-PMF are make-or-break for shaping your go-to-market (GTM) direction. 

Missteps here can delay traction, leaving founders questioning if they are moving fast enough while competitors carve the same space. Nobody wants to be the startup left behind.

There is a way forward, though it’s rarely linear. The early days are about testing, discarding, and refining until patterns emerge. If founders accept uncertainty as part of the journey, they can design GTM strategies that guide them toward PMF. 

The question is: what actions really matter in those 90 days, and how do you know if you’re on the right track?

Why the First 90 Days Pre-PMF Sets the Tone

The first 90 days pre-PMF serve as your testing ground for finding alignment between what you build and who wants it. Defining “pre-PMF” means you are not yet confident about repeatable demand. Instead, you’re validating hypotheses around users, use cases, and value. Startups at this stage can’t rely on scale tactics because scaling amplifies mistakes. That’s why clarity in these early months matters.

Founders should look for signals that validate early assumptions. Are prospective users leaning in when you explain the problem? Do design partners commit to testing? Is engagement growing in small but steady steps? These questions aren’t academic—they’re real checks against vanity momentum. A rushed GTM can lead to false confidence, which is harder to reverse. This is why the first 90 days deserve strategic attention.

Defining Early GTM Hypotheses

Identifying the Ideal Customer Profile (ICP)

Hypotheses act as the compass for your first GTM moves. Pre-PMF founders should start by sketching their ideal customer profile (ICP). This isn’t about a polished persona deck but identifying who feels the pain most sharply. Anchoring experiments around this profile gives focus and avoids scattershot outreach. Aligning ICPs early connects directly with ICP definition strategies that improve GTM clarity.

At the same time, messaging needs room for experimentation. Startups can’t afford to lock themselves into rigid taglines this early. Instead, test problem framing, benefit articulation, and even positioning angles in real conversations. Treat each pitch and demo as a data-gathering moment. Balancing discovery with execution means listening as much as selling. This ensures that GTM activities sharpen rather than distort your path to PMF.

Choosing and Testing Channels in the First 90 Days

Channel testing is where founders often feel overwhelmed. With limited resources, the temptation is to try everything at once. Instead, the first 90 days should focus on identifying a few promising channels and running lightweight experiments. The choice between inbound and outbound is less about theory and more about where your ICP naturally spends time. Context here beats trend-following.

Low-cost channels such as LinkedIn outreach, niche Slack communities, or targeted cold emails can reveal more than paid ads at this stage. The aim isn’t scaling but signal detection. One or two channels producing promising conversations are worth more than ten channels with scattered responses. To avoid stretching too thin, founders should cut off channels quickly when they don’t deliver. This is where an early channel selection framework comes in handy.

Running Effective GTM Experiments

Experiments are the engine of learning pre-PMF. A quick GTM experiment might be as simple as sending 20 customized emails, running a $200 ad test, or offering a limited pilot to ten prospects. The goal isn’t perfection but speed—how fast can you test a hypothesis and gather insights? These micro-tests offer signals on what resonates and what falls flat.

Every experiment should have a clear observation period. Two to three weeks is usually enough to reveal patterns without overcommitting. If results are inconclusive, adjust and retest rather than dragging it out. Red flags include experiments with skewed samples or results driven by outliers. Founders should embrace iteration as a discipline. Concepts like conversion rate optimization become relevant even in these early stages.

Measuring Early GTM Success

Success in the first 90 days isn’t about revenue explosions—it’s about validating motion. Founders should focus on a narrow set of metrics that reflect real traction, not vanity. For example, measuring conversations-to-demos or demos-to-trials is more meaningful than tracking social likes. Early KPIs provide leading indicators of repeatability and help you understand if experiments point toward the right ICP.

Financial metrics like CAC or LTV can be premature. Instead, measure cost per meeting or trial activation. These lightweight metrics reveal efficiency without assuming scale. Speed of iteration is equally vital: how quickly can you run tests, analyze, and pivot? This ties back to GTM KPIs, which act as benchmarks. Founders who stay disciplined here avoid the trap of chasing noisy signals that don’t advance them toward PMF.

Sales and Customer Engagement Before PMF

Founder-led sales are non-negotiable pre-PMF. Nobody else knows the product vision or the user pain points as deeply. This stage is less about revenue and more about creating structured learning loops with prospects. Each call is both a pitch and a listening session. Sales at this stage should feel like co-building with your earliest users rather than a push for volume.

At some point, expanding beyond founder-led sales becomes necessary, but not in the first 90 days. Instead, focus on securing design partners or beta customers who commit to testing and feedback. Their involvement validates whether your solution addresses real pain. Building feedback loops ensures constant product improvement and messaging alignment. This mirrors the thinking found in customer advocacy and its role in shaping trust in SaaS.

Building the Right Team and Execution Rhythm

No founder can do everything, but pre-PMF teams need to prioritize versatile skills. Founders should focus on developing a working rhythm between product and marketing. This isn’t about polished departments but about ensuring product decisions feed GTM, and GTM insights feed back into product. The loop is as important as the features themselves.

Externally, it’s critical to set realistic expectations with investors. Pre-PMF is not about scaling revenue but validating that a scalable model exists. Some founders bring in advisors or a fractional CMO to speed learning cycles. This external guidance can prevent blind spots and keep the team aligned. The right execution rhythm blends internal focus with outside expertise, creating momentum even when resources are thin.

Positioning and Messaging Experiments

Positioning isn’t a polished brand exercise pre-PMF—it’s field testing. Founders should explore different value framings in conversations and observe responses. Instead of months of branding workshops, test variations quickly. The same applies to pricing: lightweight pilots or tiered offers can uncover which models resonate without a full rollout. Early pricing experiments aren’t about margins but about adoption.

Testing message-market fit is about watching prospect reactions. Do they repeat your phrasing back to you? Do they share your solution with others? Silence is the loudest signal that positioning needs adjustment. Many founders fall into the trap of overpromising or leaning on generic messaging. Avoiding these mistakes keeps you closer to differentiation. This aligns with insights from positioning pitfalls.

Beyond the First 90 Days: Scaling the Learnings

The learnings from your first 90 days shape the blueprint for the next stage. If you’ve identified one or two channels that generate real engagement, it’s time to deepen investment. Doubling down doesn’t mean pouring money—it means refining tactics, improving copy, and solidifying processes. Discipline here determines whether you scale on solid ground or quicksand.

Scaling too early is the most common trap. Founders should only ramp spend when traction is consistent across experiments, not when one campaign performs unusually well. Warning signs of premature scaling include CAC spiking or channels losing efficiency. Frameworks from GTM strategy provide guardrails. The best teams treat scaling as controlled acceleration, not a sudden sprint.

Take Action on Your First 90 Days

The first 90 days pre-PMF aren’t about proving everything. They’re about narrowing possibilities and uncovering patterns that guide you toward PMF. From ICP clarity to small channel wins, the value lies in structured learning and fast iteration. Founders who stay disciplined in this phase set themselves up for stronger GTM momentum when scaling becomes viable.

Ready to sharpen your GTM strategy? Book a call with SaaS Consult.


FAQs on First 90 Days GTM for Pre-PMF SaaS

Frequently Asked Questions